Recommended Literature

Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG, Bell RL, Schwartz RS. 2001. Views of nature of science of questionnaire (VNOS): toward valid and meaningful assessment of learner's conceptions of nature of science. Report nr ERIC; ED472901. 48 p.

Alters BJ, Nelson CE. 2002. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution 56(10):1891-1901.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1990. The liberal art of science. Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Anderson D, Fisher K, Norman G. 2002. Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(10):952-978.

Anderson Lw, Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. 352p. p.

Angelo TA, Cross PK. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques- a handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 427 p.

Ausubel DP. 2000. The acquisition and retention of knowledge- a cognitive view. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 211 p.

Baldwin J, Ebert-May D. 1999. The development of a college biology self-efficiancy Instrument for non-majors. Science Education 83(4):397-408.

Baxter Magolda MB. 1992. Knowing and reasoning in college- gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishing. 446 p.

Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, editors. 1999. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academies Press. 319 p.

Ebert-May D, Batzli J, Lim H. 2003. Disciplinary research strategies for assessment of learning. Bioscience 53(12):1221-1228.

Ebert-May D, Brewer CA, Allred S. 1997. Innovation in large lectures- teaching for active learning through inquiry. BioScience 47(9):601-607.

Fosnot CE. 1996. Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Fox MA, Hackerman N. 2003. Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington D.C: The National Academies Press.

Hake RR. 1998. Interactive engagement vs. traditional methods: a six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66:64-74.

Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, Bruns P, Chang A, DeHaan R, Gentile J, Lauffer S, Stewart J, Tilghman SM and others. 2004. Scientific teaching. Science 304:521-522.

Herreid CF. 1998. Why isn't cooperative learning used to teach science? Bioscience 48(7):553-559.

Johnson DW, Johnson R, Smith K. 1998. Active learning: cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA. 1996. Academic controversy- enriching college instruction through intellectual conflict. Washington D.C.: The George Washington University Press. 147 p.

King PM, Strohm Kitchener K. 1994. Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 323 p.

Knight JK, Wood WB. 2005. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education 4:298-310.

Leamnson R. 1999. Thinking about teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. 169 p.

Macgregor J, Cooper J, Smith K, Robinson P. 2000. Strategies for energizing large classes: from small groups to learning communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass Publishers.

Martin BL, Mintzes JJ, Clavijo IE. 2000. Restructuring knowledge in biology: congnitive process and metacognitive reflections. International Journal of Science Education 22(3):303-323.

Mazur E. 1997. Peer instruction- a user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 253 p.

McKeachie WJ. 2002. McKeachie's teaching tips- strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 374 p.

Menges R, Svinicki M, editors. 1991. College teaching: from theory to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Munson B. 1994. Ecological misconceptions. Journal of Environmental Education 25(4):30-34.

National Research Council. 1997. Science teaching reconsidered. Washington D.C: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1999. Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. 113 p.

National Research Council. 1999. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2001. Knowing what students know- the science and design of educational assessment. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. 366 p.

National Research Council. 2002. Scientific research in education. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. 188 p.

National Science Foundation. 1997. User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. National Science Foundation. 97-153 p.

National Science Foundation. 2002. The 2002 user-friendly handbook for project evaluation. NSF. 2-57 p.

Nelson CE. 1996. Student diversity requires different approaches to college teaching, even in math and science. American Behavioral Scientist 40(2):165-175.

Novak JD. 1998. Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept MapsTM as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 251 p.

Palomba C, Banta TL. 1999. Assessment essentials- planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publ. 405 p.

Posner GJ, Strike KA, Hewson PW, Gertzog WA. 1982. Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education vol. 66(2):211-227.

Redish EF. A theoretical framework for physics education research: modeling student thinking; 2003 July 15-25, 2003; Varenna, Italy. p 1-50.

Seymour E, Hewitt NM. 1997. Talking about leaving- why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, Co: Westview Press. 429 p.

Shavelson RJ, Towne L. 2002. Scientific research in education. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

Smith KA, Sheppard, Sheri D., Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T. 2005. Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education:87-101.

Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan S. 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 69(1):21-51.

Stamp N, Armstrong M, Biger J. 2006. Ecological misconceptions, survey III: the challenge of identifying sophisticated understanding. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America:168-175.

Suter L, Frechtling J. 2000. Guideing principles for mathematics and science education research methods: report of a workshop. Washington D.C.: National Science Foundation. Report nr NSF Report 00-113.

Udovic MD, Dickman A, Postlethwait J, Wetherwax P. 2002. Workshop biology: demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. Bioscience 52(3):272-281.

Walvoord B, Anderson V. 1998. Effective grading: a tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Weimer M. 2002. Learner centered teaching: five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 288 p.

Wright J, Millar S, Kosciuk S, Penberthy D, Williams P, Wampold B. 1998. A novel strategy for assessing the effects of curriculum reform on student competence. Journal of Chemical Education 75:986-992.

Wyckoff S. 2002. Changing the culture of undergraduate science teaching. Journal of College Science Teaching 30(5):306-312.